[dmarc-discuss] is that *really* valid
roland.turner at trustsphere.com
Thu Apr 7 00:40:48 PDT 2016
Franck Martin wrote:
> Even in this case Lastname is not a valid mailbox as it does not have a valid email address,
That is my interpretation also. The ability of many MTAs to work with implicit domains internally is outside 5322's scope.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:41 AM, A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss <dmarc-discuss at dmarc.org> wrote:
Franck Martin via dmarc-discuss:
We are not discussing here the fact you can put 2 mailboxes in a From: but
that the display part must be between double quotes.
that's the point.
The message in question look like an auto-response from Yahoo!.
I *assume* it should only have one sender but due to $something there where quotes missing.
I'll forward the message headers to Yahoo! off-list.
Anyway, as this message was valid per RFC 5322 but invalid per RFC 7489
OpenDMARC correctly rejected that message. No bug so far.
More information about the dmarc-discuss