[dmarc-discuss] is that *really* valid
fmartin at linkedin.com
Wed Apr 6 09:02:38 PDT 2016
It happens a lot..
The obsoleted format allowed it, not the recent one. I think we should
ignore the obsolete format now...
The problem is:
From: john at example.com <john at example.com>
Which certain quite old versions of .net do.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:26 AM, A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss <
dmarc-discuss at dmarc.org> wrote:
> I noticed a message with this RFC5322.From:
> From: Lastname, Firstname <user at yahoo.com>
> the message was authenticated by SPF and DKIM but opendmarc rejected
> Is this From really valid? I would quote the displayname.
> If it's valid, I hit a bug in OpenDMARC.
> If it's invalid, maybe Elizabeth will be interested ...
> dmarc-discuss mailing list
> dmarc-discuss at dmarc.org
> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well
> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dmarc-discuss