[dmarc-discuss] is that *really* valid

Franck Martin fmartin at linkedin.com
Wed Apr 6 09:02:38 PDT 2016


It happens a lot..

The obsoleted format allowed it, not the recent one. I think we should
ignore the obsolete format now...

The problem is:
From: john at example.com <john at example.com>

Which certain quite old versions of .net do.


On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:26 AM, A. Schulze via dmarc-discuss <
dmarc-discuss at dmarc.org> wrote:

>
> Hello,
>
> I noticed a message with this RFC5322.From:
>
>   From: Lastname, Firstname <user at yahoo.com>
>
> the message was authenticated by SPF and DKIM but opendmarc rejected
> finally.
> Is this From really valid? I would quote the displayname.
>
> If it's valid, I hit a bug in OpenDMARC.
> If it's invalid, maybe Elizabeth will be interested ...
>
> Andreas
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc-discuss mailing list
> dmarc-discuss at dmarc.org
> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
>
> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well
> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://dmarc.org/pipermail/dmarc-discuss/attachments/20160406/572cc7b8/attachment.html>


More information about the dmarc-discuss mailing list