[dmarc-discuss] How does *this* mailing list interact with dmarc?
aiverson at spamresource.com
Sat Jun 23 16:16:16 PDT 2012
Apologies for the top posting.
Fact is, I as a sender or host of a mailing list don't have the juice to tell Yahoo or Gmail to "just whitelist my discussion list and be done with it." I am never going to consider it a suitable response to the concern raised. This gets into the same bad territory we've dealt with before; receivers are not going to special case a certain class of mail outside of a mutually agreed upon spec. Wasn't that the lesson learned from ADSP?
On Jun 22, 2012, at 10:14 PM, Jim Popovitch <jimpop at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 10:52 PM, John Levine <johnl at taugh.com> wrote:
>> I expect all of the other large mail systems do, too. Assuming they
>> are not morons, why would they pay attention to obviously wrong
>> DMARC advice rather than just continuing to whitelist the mail their
>> users surely want?
> Haha.. morons. best laugh today!
> You seem to have a short memory, or a desire to avoid past history of
> how time changes everything.
> -Jim P.
> dmarc-discuss mailing list
> dmarc-discuss at dmarc.org
> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
More information about the dmarc-discuss