[dmarc-discuss] How does *this* mailing list interact with dmarc?

Jim Popovitch jimpop at gmail.com
Fri Jun 22 15:42:47 PDT 2012


On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Michael Adkins <madkins at fb.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 6/22/12 2:02 PM, "Jim Popovitch" <jimpop at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Michael Adkins <madkins at fb.com> wrote:
>>> If they can reliably detect mailing lists and forwarders, why do they
>>>need
>>> to wait for every domain on the internet to add something to their DMARC
>>> record to tell them it's ok to fix obvious false positives?
>>
>>p=reject tells the receiver to reject, this isn't a case of false
>>positives.   Nothing would have to be added to everyone's DMARC record
>>unless they wanted to advise others what to do in the special cases of
>>Mailinglists and Forwards (the 2 well known cases that have, and will,
>>cause much strife for adopters of DMARC)
>>
>>> These are already expected to be local policy overrides.
>>
>>It would be nice for the locals to see your preference for overrides.
>
> This sentiment makes no sense to me.  The sender's preference will always
> be for the receiver to not make an obvious mistake.

It harkens back to an earlier era, my server, my rules.  I was only
extending an olive branch by saying I would like your opinion on how I
implement my rules.

-Jim P.



More information about the dmarc-discuss mailing list