[dmarc-discuss] How does *this* mailing list interact with dmarc?

Michael Adkins madkins at fb.com
Fri Jun 22 15:21:23 PDT 2012



On 6/22/12 2:02 PM, "Jim Popovitch" <jimpop at gmail.com> wrote:

>On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Michael Adkins <madkins at fb.com> wrote:
>> If they can reliably detect mailing lists and forwarders, why do they
>>need
>> to wait for every domain on the internet to add something to their DMARC
>> record to tell them it's ok to fix obvious false positives?
>
>p=reject tells the receiver to reject, this isn't a case of false
>positives.   Nothing would have to be added to everyone's DMARC record
>unless they wanted to advise others what to do in the special cases of
>Mailinglists and Forwards (the 2 well known cases that have, and will,
>cause much strife for adopters of DMARC)
>
>> These are already expected to be local policy overrides.
>
>It would be nice for the locals to see your preference for overrides.

This sentiment makes no sense to me.  The sender's preference will always
be for the receiver to not make an obvious mistake.


>
>-Jim P.
>_______________________________________________
>dmarc-discuss mailing list
>dmarc-discuss at dmarc.org
>http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
>
>NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well
>terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)




More information about the dmarc-discuss mailing list