[dmarc-discuss] How does *this* mailing list interact with dmarc?

Jim Popovitch jimpop at gmail.com
Fri Jun 22 13:39:31 PDT 2012

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Scott Kitterman <sklist at kitterman.com> wrote:
> On Friday, June 22, 2012 04:19:43 PM Jim Popovitch wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 4:11 PM, J. Trent Adams <jtrentadams at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> > Brian -
>> >
>> > Do you have any suggestions how this can be accomplished?
>> >
>> > As you can see, this isn't new ground, but if we've missed a viable
>> > solution we're all ears.  The general discussions have already
>> > illuminated theses issues, but feel free to propose solutions that you
>> > see working for broad deployment.
>> I have a suggestion for consideration.  p=quarantine
>> o=mailinglists,forwards  (where o == receiver determined overrides)
> If that actually works at getting a significant amount of phishing stopped, the
> phishers will just start pretending they are a mailing list.  There's no
> particular advantage to them doing so now, so they don't, but if you create
> the advantage, they will.

I do think it's a good step in the right direction to empower
receivers to make on-the-fly judgments based on pre-determined
allowable overrides.

Phishers will always find away, In fact I think they benefit from p=none.

-Jim P.

More information about the dmarc-discuss mailing list