[dmarc-discuss] problem parsing report from 126.com

Brian Corrigan bcorrigan at majorleaguegaming.com
Mon Jun 18 06:20:30 PDT 2012


Also note: The 126.com reports are formatting dates as floats instead
of integers.  This is true for 163.com as well.  I don't have history
working yet, but if you submit an XML file to my little validator it
shows this issue.  (http://www.structure.cc)



On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:22 AM, pandalove <pandalove at 126.com> wrote:
> Hi Andreas and all,
>
>>> o the subject/Report-ID contain < and >
>
> According to Part 12.2.1 of DMARC spec and Part 3.6.4 of RFC5322, If I read
> them correctly, the "Report-ID:" tag should contain < and >.
> Looks like rddmarc should verify and compat it.
>
> From http://www.dmarc.org/draft-dmarc-base-00-01.txt:
> dmarc-subject = %x52.65.70.6f.72.74 1*FWS    ; "Report"
> ...
> %x52.65.70.6f.72.74.2d.49.44.3a ; "Report-ID:"
> msg-id                       ; from RFC5322
>
> From http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322! :
> msg-id          =   [CFWS] "<" id-left "@" id-right ">" [CFWS]
>
>>> uses content-type "application/x-zip-compressed" instead
>>> "application/zip"
>>> the mail contained an "unexpected" part
>
> The dmarc_aggregate_report.xsd in report is useless. I have fixed them all,
> tomorrow you may receive new reports without these problems.
>
> Thanks,
> Junping
>
>
> At 2012-06-18 16:00:05,"Andreas Schulze" <sca at andreasschulze.de> wrote:
>>Hi all,
>>
>>today I received my first report from 126.com. Thanks!
>>I had to edit the mail for import using rddmarc.
>>
>>o the subject/Report-ID contain < and >
>>  http://www.techsneeze.com/how-parse-dmarc-reports failed to show the Report-ID as link.
>>
>>  Subject: Report Domain: datev.de Submitter: 126.com Report-ID:
>>   <aggr_report_datev.de_20120615_126.com>
>>
>>o the attached zipfile uses content-type "application/x-zip-compressed" instead "application/zip"
>>  I use the rddmard from http://www.taugh.com/rddmarc/ (from february 2012)
>>  are there any updates available?
>>
>>o the mail contained an "unexpected" part
>>  Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="dmarc_aggregate_report.xsd"
>>  Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="dmarc_aggregate_report.xsd"
>>
>>  what is this good for?
>>
>>Andreas
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>dmarc-discuss mailing list
>>dmarc-discuss at dmarc.org
>>http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
>>NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc-discuss mailing list
> dmarc-discuss at dmarc.org
> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well
> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
>



More information about the dmarc-discuss mailing list