[dmarc-discuss] problem parsing report from 126.com
bcorrigan at majorleaguegaming.com
Mon Jun 18 06:20:30 PDT 2012
Also note: The 126.com reports are formatting dates as floats instead
of integers. This is true for 163.com as well. I don't have history
working yet, but if you submit an XML file to my little validator it
shows this issue. (http://www.structure.cc)
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:22 AM, pandalove <pandalove at 126.com> wrote:
> Hi Andreas and all,
>>> o the subject/Report-ID contain < and >
> According to Part 12.2.1 of DMARC spec and Part 3.6.4 of RFC5322, If I read
> them correctly, the "Report-ID:" tag should contain < and >.
> Looks like rddmarc should verify and compat it.
> From http://www.dmarc.org/draft-dmarc-base-00-01.txt:
> dmarc-subject = %x126.96.36.199f.72.74 1*FWS ; "Report"
> %x188.8.131.52f.72.74.2d.49.44.3a ; "Report-ID:"
> msg-id ; from RFC5322
> From http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322! :
> msg-id = [CFWS] "<" id-left "@" id-right ">" [CFWS]
>>> uses content-type "application/x-zip-compressed" instead
>>> the mail contained an "unexpected" part
> The dmarc_aggregate_report.xsd in report is useless. I have fixed them all,
> tomorrow you may receive new reports without these problems.
> At 2012-06-18 16:00:05,"Andreas Schulze" <sca at andreasschulze.de> wrote:
>>today I received my first report from 126.com. Thanks!
>>I had to edit the mail for import using rddmarc.
>>o the subject/Report-ID contain < and >
>> http://www.techsneeze.com/how-parse-dmarc-reports failed to show the Report-ID as link.
>> Subject: Report Domain: datev.de Submitter: 126.com Report-ID:
>>o the attached zipfile uses content-type "application/x-zip-compressed" instead "application/zip"
>> I use the rddmard from http://www.taugh.com/rddmarc/ (from february 2012)
>> are there any updates available?
>>o the mail contained an "unexpected" part
>> Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="dmarc_aggregate_report.xsd"
>> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="dmarc_aggregate_report.xsd"
>> what is this good for?
>>dmarc-discuss mailing list
>>dmarc-discuss at dmarc.org
>>NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
> dmarc-discuss mailing list
> dmarc-discuss at dmarc.org
> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well
> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
More information about the dmarc-discuss