[dmarc-discuss] problem parsing report from 126.com
pandalove at 126.com
Mon Jun 18 02:22:03 PDT 2012
Hi Andreas and all,
>> o the subject/Report-ID contain < and >
According to Part 12.2.1 of DMARC spec and Part 3.6.4 of RFC5322, If I read them correctly, the "Report-ID:" tag should contain < and >.
Looks like rddmarc should verify and compat it.
dmarc-subject = %x18.104.22.168f.72.74 1*FWS ; "Report"
%x22.214.171.124f.72.74.2d.49.44.3a ; "Report-ID:"
msg-id ; from RFC5322
msg-id = [CFWS] "<" id-left "@" id-right ">" [CFWS]
>> uses content-type "application/x-zip-compressed" instead "application/zip"
>> the mail contained an "unexpected" part
The dmarc_aggregate_report.xsd in report is useless. I have fixed them all, tomorrow you may receive new reports without these problems.
At 2012-06-18 16:00:05,"Andreas Schulze" <sca at andreasschulze.de> wrote:
>today I received my first report from 126.com. Thanks!
>I had to edit the mail for import using rddmarc.
>o the subject/Report-ID contain < and >
> http://www.techsneeze.com/how-parse-dmarc-reports failed to show the Report-ID as link.
> Subject: Report Domain: datev.de Submitter: 126.com Report-ID:
>o the attached zipfile uses content-type "application/x-zip-compressed" instead "application/zip"
> I use the rddmard from http://www.taugh.com/rddmarc/ (from february 2012)
> are there any updates available?
>o the mail contained an "unexpected" part
> Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="dmarc_aggregate_report.xsd"
> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="dmarc_aggregate_report.xsd"
> what is this good for?
>dmarc-discuss mailing list
>dmarc-discuss at dmarc.org
>NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the dmarc-discuss