[dmarc-discuss] problem parsing report from 126.com

pandalove pandalove at 126.com
Mon Jun 18 02:22:03 PDT 2012


Hi Andreas and all,


>> o the subject/Report-ID contain < and >


According to Part 12.2.1 of DMARC spec and Part 3.6.4 of RFC5322, If I read them correctly, the "Report-ID:" tag should contain < and >.
Looks like rddmarc should verify and compat it.


>From http://www.dmarc.org/draft-dmarc-base-00-01.txt:
dmarc-subject = %x52.65.70.6f.72.74 1*FWS    ; "Report"
...
%x52.65.70.6f.72.74.2d.49.44.3a ; "Report-ID:"
msg-id                       ; from RFC5322


>From http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322:
msg-id          =   [CFWS] "<" id-left "@" id-right ">" [CFWS]


>> uses content-type "application/x-zip-compressed" instead "application/zip"
>> the mail contained an "unexpected" part


The dmarc_aggregate_report.xsd in report is useless. I have fixed them all, tomorrow you may receive new reports without these problems.


Thanks,
Junping



At 2012-06-18 16:00:05,"Andreas Schulze" <sca at andreasschulze.de> wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>today I received my first report from 126.com. Thanks!
>I had to edit the mail for import using rddmarc.
>
>o the subject/Report-ID contain < and >
>  http://www.techsneeze.com/how-parse-dmarc-reports failed to show the Report-ID as link.
>
>  Subject: Report Domain: datev.de Submitter: 126.com Report-ID:
>   <aggr_report_datev.de_20120615_126.com>
>
>o the attached zipfile uses content-type "application/x-zip-compressed" instead "application/zip"
>  I use the rddmard from http://www.taugh.com/rddmarc/ (from february 2012)
>  are there any updates available?
>
>o the mail contained an "unexpected" part
>  Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="dmarc_aggregate_report.xsd"
>  Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="dmarc_aggregate_report.xsd"
>
>  what is this good for?
>
>Andreas
>
>_______________________________________________
>dmarc-discuss mailing list
>dmarc-discuss at dmarc.org
>http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
>NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://medusa.blackops.org/pipermail/dmarc-discuss/attachments/20120618/2b0d5154/attachment.htm>


More information about the dmarc-discuss mailing list