[dmarc-discuss] SPF failed?

Or Weinberger Or.Weinberger at 888holdings.com
Mon Jun 11 02:09:53 PDT 2012

Hi Michiel,

What do you mean it's not a part of bounce.cassavaengage.mkt3390.com<http://bounce.cassavaengage.mkt3390.com>

This is the current SPF record of bounce.cassavaengage.mkt3390.com<http://bounce.cassavaengage.mkt3390.com>:

"v=spf1 ip4: ip4: ip4: ip4: ip4: ip4: ip4: ip4: ip4: ip4: ip4: -all"

It contains all of our sending IPs, including as mentioned below

From: Maarten Oelering [mailto:maarten at postmastery.net]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 12:07 PM
To: dmarc-discuss at dmarc.org
Cc: Or Weinberger
Subject: Re: [dmarc-discuss] SPF failed?

Hi Or,

SPF alone, as checked on the envelope sender (return-path) validates. But DMARC requires that the envelope sender domain is aligned with the From: header domain. This is to prevent spoofing of the envelope sender.

Maarten Oelering

On 11 jun. 2012, at 10:55, Or Weinberger wrote:

Hey everyone,

Trying to figure out why I'm seeing an SPF fail in the dmarc report:


As you can see, under the <policy_evaluated> I'm getting <spf>fail</spf> but under the <auth_results> the spf seems to pass.


Or Weinberger
Email Marketing Specialist

Medinat Hayehudim 85A
Herzliya Pituach, Israel
t:   +972 (732) 888-695
e:  or.weinberger at 888holdings.com<mailto:or.weinberger at 888holdings.com>


dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss at dmarc.org<mailto:dmarc-discuss at dmarc.org>
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://medusa.blackops.org/pipermail/dmarc-discuss/attachments/20120611/6c4e996c/attachment-0001.htm>

More information about the dmarc-discuss mailing list