[dmarc-discuss] What is the DMARC reject SMTP text?

Michiel van de Vis m.vandevis at acervus.nl
Wed Jun 6 23:31:57 PDT 2012

Certainly, if there is an advice/example in the specs, that would do.


2012/6/7 Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser at gmail.com>

> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Michiel van de Vis <m.vandevis at acervus.nl
> > wrote:
>> I believe it can be very useful for SMTP admins to receive a clear
>> response which states the problem and preferably a link to more information.
>> So I would prefer a combination of the 126.com / scanmailx.com responses.
>> Futhermore I think the response should at least contain DMARC. This might
>> also help to 'spread the word' to SMTP admins who analyse their logs.
>> /Michiel
> I think these are all reasonable things for the spec to suggest.  I don't
> think, however, that we should make any of them into compliance
> requirements.  Does that sound reasonable?
> -MSK
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://medusa.blackops.org/pipermail/dmarc-discuss/attachments/20120607/b233bb38/attachment.htm>

More information about the dmarc-discuss mailing list