[dmarc-discuss] What is the DMARC reject SMTP text?

Murray S. Kucherawy superuser at gmail.com
Wed Jun 6 23:30:14 PDT 2012

On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Michiel van de Vis
<m.vandevis at acervus.nl>wrote:

> I believe it can be very useful for SMTP admins to receive a clear
> response which states the problem and preferably a link to more information.
> So I would prefer a combination of the 126.com / scanmailx.com responses.
> Futhermore I think the response should at least contain DMARC. This might
> also help to 'spread the word' to SMTP admins who analyse their logs.
> /Michiel
I think these are all reasonable things for the spec to suggest.  I don't
think, however, that we should make any of them into compliance
requirements.  Does that sound reasonable?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://medusa.blackops.org/pipermail/dmarc-discuss/attachments/20120606/9deee69d/attachment.htm>

More information about the dmarc-discuss mailing list