[dmarc-discuss] Include statement in DMARC DNS record

Michiel van de Vis m.vandevis at acervus.nl
Fri Jun 1 00:59:17 PDT 2012


Thats true, when using a subdomain per customer the include is very usefull.

/Michiel



2012/6/1 Jesper Knudsen <jkn at scanmailx.com>

> Hi Michiel,****
>
> ** **
>
> It’s not specifically the subdomain I am thinking of but more the
> possibility to alter customers DMARC record without their involvement as I
> do for their SPF. I am basically just looking for means to achieve the same
> and think some kind of include statement should do the job.****
>
> ** **
>
> /Jesper****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* michiel at rotorsolutions.nl [mailto:michiel at rotorsolutions.nl] *On
> Behalf Of *Michiel van de Vis
> *Sent:* 1. juni 2012 08:39
> *To:* Jesper Knudsen
> *Subject:* Re: [dmarc-discuss] Include statement in DMARC DNS record****
>
> ** **
>
> Hi Jesper,****
>
> ** **
>
> I dont think this will help you much.****
>
> ** **
>
> Because when you use one subdomain, you also need to apply the same policy
> to all your customers.****
>
> As the DMARC aligment is a per-client procedure, i don't think you need a
> subdomain for that.****
>
> ** **
>
> How do you see this?****
>
> ** **
>
> Michiel****
>
>
>
> ****
>
> 2012/6/1 Jesper Knudsen <jkn at scanmailx.com>****
>
> As a ESP for many customers without control of the their DNS, it would be
> very nice if we could alter the DMARC record on behalf of these customers
> without having them all take action (that will never work anyways). Today
> they are asked to insert our default record but I can imagine that over
> time we might want to change the policy, pct or report addresses. ****
>
>  ****
>
> I would therefore recommend we consider having a include statement in the
> DMARC record (such as has been done with SPF) so that my customer can
> create a simple record such as "v=DMARC1; inc=_dmarc.scanmailx.com;”. If
> using a include statement then:****
>
>  ****
>
> 1)      Only one level of recursion****
>
> 2)      No other parameters mush be present****
>
>  ****
>
> This will make parsing of the record relative easy and not add to much
> additional DNS overhead.****
>
>  ****
>
> Comments?****
>
>  ****
>
> ****
>
> *Jesper Knudsen*****
>
> Scandinavian Mail eXchange****
>
> Kløvervang 4 -  DK-2970 Hørsholm - Denmark****
>
> Phone: (+45) 36948330 Mobile: (+45) 21791763****
>
> Email: jkn at scanmailx.com - Web: www.scanmailx.com****
>
> Like us on facebook - Follow us on LinkedIn****
>
>  ****
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc-discuss mailing list
> dmarc-discuss at dmarc.org
> http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
> NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well
> terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)****
>
> ** **
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://medusa.blackops.org/pipermail/dmarc-discuss/attachments/20120601/e507fbe6/attachment.htm>


More information about the dmarc-discuss mailing list