[dmarc-discuss] reject, ADSP discard, and SPF -all
fmartin at linkedin.com
Sun Feb 5 03:45:13 PST 2012
On 2/5/12 1:49 , "Jim Popovitch" <jimpop at gmail.com> wrote:
>On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 1:51 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy <msk at cloudmark.com>
>> Every time we've tried to say MLMs need to conform to something new, the
>> reply comes back "How dare you!".
>That's chiefly because the consensus always varies widely on just what
>should be done, particularly over time. Take DKIM/DomainKeys for
>instance, In 2005 it was all the rage to tell MLMs to sign their
>> But having said that, I wonder how far we'd get if we got the major
>> the mailing list management space to work with us. Maybe that's "good
>I understand that things change over time. But, as a mailinglist
>operator, going on 12 years, there doesn't seem to be a master plan.
>;-) A master plan would go a long way to convince others to spend
>time implementing code changes.
Seems the mailman people know what to do for a long time, but never had
More information about the dmarc-discuss